Wishbone: Furst Impressions

Tags

, , ,

This is slightly off topic by nature of the fact that it’s a video as opposed to a book. But it’s fun! I first heard about Furst Impressions at a recent JASNA meeting, in conversation with author Lauren Willig, who had been speaking about Jane Austen’s afterlife in the publishing world. After nearly having a heart attack, thinking that she was about to give the same talk I was planning (she didn’t–phew!) I was eager to discuss with her my ideas in reference to adaptions for children and young adults. She mentioned Wishbone, a series I am familiar with because we have several book tie-ins at work, even though I had never actually watched it.

Unlike the Pride and Prejudice board book, which purports to be for children, this is an adaptation which genuinely attempts to reach its audience, not just wink slyly at the parents. The episode is not so much an adaptation as an attempt to highlight the plot elements which would have some relevance to middle school readers. This is illustrated by the story line involving Wishbone’s human friends, which is interwoven with his retelling of Austen’s story. Think of it as Pride and Prejudice as an After School Special, with life lessons on the importance about not judging others by their clothes, the pitfalls of listening to gossip, and the importance of a heart-felt apology.

Eat your heart out, Colin Firth.

Watching the Jack Russell Terrier Wishbone take on the role of Fitzwilliam Darcy is slightly unsettling (although his posh English accent is cute.) He’s more likely to dig up the grounds of Pemberley than preserve it. Still, if you watch the episode you will be treated to a rather good plot summary, some fine dancing scenes, multiple props for your local library, and an OTT performance by Jeanne Simpson, who plays Caroline Bingley. She really lets those Regency niceties go and plays Caroline Bingley as if she were the biggest middle school meanie around.

For Darkness Shows the Stars by Diana Peterfreund: futuristic Persuasion

Tags

, , , , ,

Back to Austen business after a “brief” hiatus (also known as serving on a book committee, which took up all of my time. A fabulous experience, by the way!)

June 2012 sees the release of For Darkness Shows the Stars by young adult author (and JASNA member!) Diana Peterfreund. The book takes place on a post-apocalyptic Earth in which genetic experimentation leads to the almost whole-scale destruction of humanity, an event known as the Reduction. It is also the story of a family of landed gentry who used to be important but are now living on past glories and precious little else, held together by the resolve and good sense of its youngest daughter. Janeites will easily recognize “Darkness” as Persuasion. Enthusiastic reviews have already appeared, and in light of the success of The Hunger Games, this book will be enjoyed by readers searching for the next great dystopian read. For the purposes of this blog (and my upcoming talk,) I will be examining For Darkness Shows the Stars solely as an adaptation. This is a spoiler-free analysis (unless you have not already read Persuasion!)

Peterfreund has taken what she calls in the book’s Acknowledgements, the “bones” of Austen’s story, and “made [changes] to its DNA”. However, unlike the Reduction, this genetic experiment works, and works very well. Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth are now Elliot North and Kai (later known as Captain Malakai Wentforth.) Kellynch Hall is now the North Estate, a once fertile farm which has been nearly decimated by poor crop rotation and an exodus of its staff–the Posts–barring a handful who are faithful to Elliot. Louisa Musgrove is now Olivia Grove. The book can be divided into two categories in terms of interpretation: fun details, and captured essence. ‘Fun details’ would include the hat-tipping involved in the characters’ names. Also, some well-chosen quotes from Persuasion at the start of each new volume (sometimes a risky thing to include because it only serves to highlight what a master writer Austen is, and how difficult it is to measure up.) But fun details do not a successful adaptation make (and neither does plot point-for-plot point, character-for-character transferral, for that matter.) The success lies in the book’s ‘captured essence’.

Publishers would not bother to mention that a book is a Jane Austen adaptation if they did not want to appeal to Jane Austen devotees, so informed readers need to recognize the source and appreciate the connection. Peterfreund accomplishes this by maintaining the three scenes which, for my money, cannot be missing from a successful Persuasion adaptation: Wentworth’s initial–almost unintentional–kindness to Anne Elliot when he removes those troublesome children from her back, the Cobb at Lyme Regis, and The Letter.

In this book, Kai does not simply save Elliot from a nuisance, but actually saves her life. The Letter is paraphrased quite prettily and concludes what has been a subplot involving Elliot’s and Kai’s childhood correspondence (always a nice touch in an Austen adaptation, since letters are so important to the understanding of Jane herself.)

But it is with the “Lyme Regis” scene that Peterfreund really earns her cred as Austen adapter. She takes what is, without argument, one of the most famous scenes in all of Austen’s books and not only does it justice but improves upon its significance for the purpose of her own story. Olivia’s fall is not the result of silly flirtation, nor a plot device to bring the hero and heroine closer. It results from a desire to taste the glory of a different life which Kai is revealing to the sheltered, privileged girl–and, of course, revealing to Elliot. For her part, Elliot is starting to understand the change which her childhood sweetheart has undergone–not just from boy to man, or servant to Captain. She is looking at a force which could possibly undo all that she has been raised to believe about the nature of the world and society in general. In Persuasion, the changing of the guard is from old money to new. In “Darkness” the stakes are higher and involve the future of the human race itself. I was thrilled with the way Peterfreund handled this scene.”Bravo!”

As I assess these Austen adaptations, I am of course on the look-out as to whether or not the books serve as launch pads for directing readers to the original. Peterfruend has written a story which does indeed take Persuasion‘s DNA and engineers it to tell a tale which is new and of interest to teen readers. The sci-fi backdrop is intriguing, and about as far from the ballroom as you can get. Thwarted love reignited is rewarding, and in Elliot’s case seems much less a fallout of being persuaded as recognizing a sense of duty. There is no Lady Russell counterpart advising her; Elliot persuades herself that she should not run off with Kai, and her reasoning seems justified in light of her responsibility to the estate and the workers in her care, who face an uncertain future because of the underlying social upheaval. There is a moral debate at the core of “Darkness,” due to its nature as a dystopian fantasy, which is not a part of Persuasion, a contemporary novel. So why would a reader who enjoys For Darkness Shows the Stars feel compelled to read Persuasion? What does the original have that “Darkness” does not?

Well, other than Jane Austen at the helm, the one element from Persuasion which Peterfreund is not able to duplicate, is the significance of age. Elliot is 18. She turns down Kai when she is 14. Fourteen?! How iron-clad is a love at 14? For teen readers who may very well consider 25 to be old, never mind anything beyond 30, the heartbreak of a 14-year-old is real. They would not smirk and quote condescending platitudes about “fish in the sea”. That’s what I, as a 42-year-old reader, would do. But consider that, at the start of Persuasion, Anne Elliot is 29, having given up her love at 19. The difference between 14 and 18, and 19 and 29, is obvious. Anne has endured 10 years of regretting her decision. A whole decade of “what-ifs!” How can an 18-year-old girl understand that?

Which is precisely what makes Persuasion, Austen’s most grown-up love story, perfect for adaptation for teens! Because one day those teen readers will be adults and they will be able to revisit the story with the wisdom of time. Pride and Prejudice, with it’s partying and flirting, or Sense and Sensibility with the tear-away Marianne (who I find becomes more and more annoying the older I get) are such obvious choices because the girls involved are teens themselves. Persuasion has a richness and wisdom which comes from living as an adult with the choices made as a teen. Evidently Anne was a silly teen herself, but she wasn’t silly in love. She was silly in judgement. In a society where the rules are changing, and where men not born to money can become wealthy through their own industry, time is the one rule they cannot overturn. Anne makes Wentworth realize what he wasted in grudges and resentment. Her triumph is born of that time she serves.

And that is what is waiting for readers who follow For Darkness Shows the StarsĀ with Persuasion. Same story, fuller perspective. And because Peterfreund’s story is so good, I have no doubt that her readers will find their way to Austen.

I would like to thank Harper Collins for sending me an advance copy of this book. For Darkness Shows the Stars is available 6/12/12.

Pride and Prejudice: the board book

Tags

, ,

As I try to maintain a serious discussion about the value of adaptations of Jane Austen’s works for an audience which may not already be familiar with her, I find myself confronted with this book. I managed to bury all knowledge of its existence deep in the recesses of my brain; it only returned to my notice because of a rant I indulged in over at Not Just for Kids about the board book version of Jane Eyre. And since I plan to look at books for middle grade readers as well as young adults–I figured I might as well toss this into the mix.

The Little Miss Austen Pride and Prejudice is clearly not written for a young adult audience. In fact just who is it written for? It’s a board book, so the obvious answer is, it is written for babies. But that raises the more problematic question of, what do babies need with Pride and Prejudice? Well, in this case, Pride and Prejudice has been adapted as a counting book. Okay–babies need counting books. But why base one on Pride and Prejudice? Could it be because adults with purchasing power like Pride and Prejudice? Hmmm…that sounds like a cynical marketing ploy. But maybe I am the cynic. Maybe these books are really meant to edify. In fact, the back of the book claims that “BabyLit is a fashionable way to introduce your child to the world of classic literature.” (I suppose the unfashionable way would be to read the actual classic to said child.) So the intended audience of the book is children after all! And yet, only an adult who has actually read Pride and Prejudice would understand why “4 marriage proposals” or “5 sisters” or “10 10,000 pounds a year” is significant. They get to have a little “a-ha moment” while their baby wears the book like a hat. Or, better yet, throws it aside in favor of something they can relate to, like Goodnight Gorilla or Each Peach Pear Plumb (now that is a book which cleverly introduces classics to children in a meaningful way.)

This is not meant to be a snobbish rant about what is suitable reading material for grown-ups. Hey–if adults want to read a board book based on Pride and Prejudice and have a chuckle, have at it. And frankly, I am completely in favor of adults reading childrens books for fun. But I am discussing adaptations, and this particular book is a poor adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, and I cannot forgive that. You don’t play with perfection and then produce pap. The book’s success, both as an adaptation and a reading experience, is entirely dependent on the reader’s knowledge of the original. If one is not already familiar with Kitty and Lydia’s obsession with Red Coats, “7 soldiers in uniform” falls flat and is meaningless; it’s just a random stop between 1 and 10.

At their best, adaptations are love letters between an admirer and the original source. At their worst they are vanity projects which nick the best elements from someone else’s story. I expect most of the books I will read for this project will probably fall somewhere in the middle, providing in-jokes to readers in the know and a pleasant enough read for everyone else. But I’m pretty sure I will not find one as spectacularly off the mark as this one.

Enthusiasm by Polly Shulman: getting to know Jane Austen

Tags

,

“There is little more likely to exasperate a person of sense then finding herself tied by affection and habit to an Enthusiast.”

Polly Shulman’s romantic comedy Enthusiasm isn’t so much an adaptation, as it is a crash course on Austen themes, plot devices, and trivia. The story of two teenage girls, best friends all their lives, who find themselves attracted to the same boy, reads like a love letter to all things JA. Although we are (sort of) spared a reworking of “It is a truth universally acknowledged,” Austen’s presence is immediate: protagonist Julie Lefkowitz is a self-professed “person of sense.” Her best friend, Ashleigh, is an “Enthusiast”, incapable of enjoying anything without becoming obsessed. When Ashleigh reads Pride and Prejudice, which happens to be Julie’s favorite book, she embraces it with….well….enthusiasm. This means adopting the book as a manual by which to live. Ashleigh’s enthusiasm is not unlike the desire often seen in adaptations written for adults, with grown women bemoaning the fact that their lives are not like that of an Austen heroine. Or, to be more precise–complaining that they have no Darcy. Ashleigh has a remedy for that problem. She and Julie will simply crash the formal dance at the nearby posh boys’ school and snag themselves a Darcy and a Bingley.

From this point on, Austen herself becomes a peripheral character in the story. There are times that the reader needs to be reminded that Ashleigh’s crazed behaviour is because at one point she read Pride and Prejudice. However, the thematic cap-tipping by Shulman is evident to the informed reader. Consider these examples:

  • the two female leads are a combination of a sensible girl and a strong-willed girl completely ruled by her emotions;
  • there is a ball in which the heroines encounter the heroes;
  • a male provider remarries a woman who puts his previous family’s needs and cares behind her own;
  • correspondence between the leads plays an important part in the story;
  • there are amateur theatricals (a student-written adaptation of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, which the plot of Enthusiasm sometimes seems to mimic as well;)
  • match-making gone wrong;
  • the book has a single-word title;
  • one character suppressing her love to preserve the feelings and presumed prior claim of another;
  • the hero’s name is Grandison;
  • Julie’s birthday is December 17th, the day after Jane’s (a fact curiously unmentioned in the story;)
  • a scene where Julie and Ashleigh look at portraits in a museum and try to match them to people they know;
  • the combination of wealthy hero and less wealthy heroine (yet still a gentleman’s daughter;)
  • a guy who thinks he is in a relationship with a girl, but she does not agree (paging John Thorpe.)

Shulman has managed to touch upon almost every one of Austen’s novels and makes a few references to the author’s life as well. Not bad. Whether the book would draw new readers to Austen is another matter. There is not enough Austen analysis within the book to steer readers to the original source material, although the edition I read had bonus material which included “Little Known facts about Enthusiasm and Jane Austen,” The Life and Legacy of Jane Austen”, and “Discussion Questions,” almost all of which are about Jane Austen (as opposed to Enthusiasm) and require a working knowledge of her works to answer. In keeping with the theme of this blog, Question number 1 is ” Why do Jane Austen’s stories translate so well into modern stories?” Good question, but not really relevant to Enthusiasm itself since it is not a straight reworking of a specific work.

Be that as it may, the idea of enthusiasm as a state of being is certainly relevant to Janeites, if not Austen’s books themselves. Whether or not I think Jane Austen’s stories translate well into modern stories (and I’m taking no stands at this point!) there is undeniably something about Jane Austen which we as readers want to embrace and live with, just as Ashleigh (sorry–may I call her Maryanne?) tries to do by wearing long dresses and calling Julie ‘Miss Lefkowitz’. Her hugely demonstrative brand of enthusiasm is but one version of the Janeite passion. As Julie says when she realizes that her friend has gone bonkers for Pride and Prejudice:

“Now, for the first time, I had taken the lead, introducing her to an interest of my own. But how long would it be before her passion overshadowed mine? Would she take over my favorite books, leaving nothing for me? I was convinced that I felt as strongly about Jane Austen’s books as Ashleigh had ever felt about any of her crazes, but my love was deep and silent–and therefore easily overshadowed. I would never, for example, speak Jane Austen’s language. That would be undignified and unworthy of the writer I adored. ” (p. 4)

Julie is the side of fandom which is happy enough with the canon; who can return to those six novels time after time and find new gems to savor. Ashleigh is fueling the business in P&P prequels, sequels, murder mysteries, time-travel stories, and graphic novels.

Interestingly, one question the story does not answer is whether or not Ashleigh’s enthusiasm survives the end of her craze. Once she can approach Austen with a level(ish) head, does she chose to read Northanger Abbey? Or Emma? It’s hard to imagine that a reader who loved Pride and Prejudice wouldn’t at least pick up one more Austen. And one who was enthusiastic about her….no excuse not to.

Getting started

Tags

Hello, and welcome to my new home in the blogosphere. If you have found me because you are a reader of Not Just for Kids, or because you are interested in the topic (or, perhaps, lost,) thanks for stopping by.

This blog has its roots in the fact that in 11 months’ time I will be standing before the Massachusetts region of the Jane Austen Society of North America, delivering a talk. The general theme of my talk will be about the trend towards Jane Austen adaptations in current Young Adult literature. I have been a childrens librarian for over ten years now, but four years ago my scope of attention widened to include young adult literature as well. In those four years I have seen titles such as Prom and Prejudice, Prada and Prejudice and Sass and Serendipity, pass before my eyes. I couldn’t help but notice them, being a JASNA life member.

It’s no secret that the number of Austen adaptations, sequels, and mash-ups has mushroomed to nuclear proportions in the past 15-20 years. So why should a few more teen titles catch my eye? They caught my eye and have given me food for thought for the simple reason that I don’t think YA readers are necessarily an obvious audience for Austen adaptations. It makes sense to write prequels and sequels and alternate reality regencies for the adult Austen fan base; the readers who already know her and love her and simply cannot reconcile themselves to the fact that six novels and a handful of letters is IT. We create more Austen to fill the gap of not-enough-Austen. Young adult readers, on the other hand, are at the stage where they might just be discovering Austen, and reading the words “It is a truth universally acknowledged” for the very first time. Surely, if one wants to share a love of Austen with a young reader, wouldn’t it simply make sense to give them…. you know….actual Austen?

Still, there is something to be said about being inspired by a master. Zadie Smith basically reworked Howards End, and nobody called her out on it. So how are these books enriching young adult literature? Are they substantial enough to stand on their own without the helping hand provided by the original. Will they actually introduce readers to Jane Austen? And is anyone writer enough to put Pride and Prejudice aside and tackle Mansfield Park?

I intend to use this blog as a sort of open notebook to help me keep track of the books I am reading, ideas I am developing, theories I’m trashing–and maybe even indulge in some panic–as I prepare for my talk. Comments are always appreciated, and I would love readers who know of teen Austen adaptations to point me in their general direction. Here is my reading list so far:

  1. Enthusiasm (Polly Shulman)
  2. Prom and Prejudice (Elizabeth Eulberg)
  3. The Dashwood Sisters’ Secrets of Love (Rosie Rushton)
  4. Prada and Prejudice (MandyHubbard)
  5. Cassandra’s Sister (Veronica Bennett)–Cheeky title, by the way!
  6. Pies and Prejudice (Heather Vogel Frederick)
  7. I was Jane Austen’s Best Friend (Cora Harrison)
  8. Epic Fail (Clair LaZebnik)
  9. Sass and Serendipity (Jennifer Ziegler)
  10. The Jane Austen Diaries (Jenni James)
  11. Jane Austen in the 21st Century (Rosie Rushton)
  12. Jane Austen: a Life Revealed (Catherine Reef)

The last title is not an adaptation, but an actual biography. However, when it was published last year, it claimed to be the first biography about Austen written specifically for young adults. All those adaptations, and then someone finally decided to write about Austen herself. For reals. Interesting.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,164 other followers